Canon powershot g1 x mark ii vs sony a6000

CANON POWERSHOT G1 X MARK II VS SONY A6000 MANUAL
CANON POWERSHOT G1 X MARK II VS SONY A6000 PORTABLE
CANON POWERSHOT G1 X MARK II VS SONY A6000 SERIES

Note I tested the вЂEnhanced Grip EditionвЂ™ which is a little chunkier than the normal one, but even that has plenty ot hold onto.ДЄ quick note to the divers out there: Canon offers the WP-DC53 housing for the G1 X II which is good to depths of 40m. The greater stability also means less chance of camera shake. You can hold it pretty securely in one hand, whereas I find I need to use two with the RX100 III. ThereвЂ™s simply much more to hold onto, with a generous grip on the front and a decent thumb rest on the rear. Of course while a larger camera may not be as pocketable, it is normally more comfortable and stable to hold, and that certainly applies to the G1 X II. It is quite simply a much less casual camera to carry around. To me, the Sony RX100 III is a camera IвЂ™d take anywhere with me, whereas the Canon G1 X II is something I may think twice about вЂ“ after all, itвЂ™s unlikely to fit into any pocket outside of a coat, so itвЂ™s something I have to think about accommodating, maybe in a bad or with a strap.

CANON POWERSHOT G1 X MARK II VS SONY A6000 PORTABLE

Measuring 102x58x41mm and weighing 290g, the RX100 III is simply much more portable than the Canon G1 X II, and the physical difference between them is clear in the photo above.

CANON POWERSHOT G1 X MARK II VS SONY A6000 SERIES

The RX100 series has a smaller 1in type sensor, but itвЂ™s still a comfortable step up from point-and-shoot models and smartphone cameras, while crucially remaining relatively pocketable. Remember both the Sony A6000 and Fujifilm X100s feature built-in viewfinders and larger APS-C sensors to be fair the Sony kit zoom isnвЂ™t as bright or long as the Canon and the X100s lens is fixed in focal length, but it does illustrate how the G1 X II is one of the largest cameras in its peer group.ДЄbove IвЂ™ve pictured it against SonyвЂ™s Cyber-shot RX100 III, the third in what has become arguably the most successful series of compact cameras for enthusiasts вЂ“ and coincidentally one that coasts roughly the same as the Canon, so IвЂ™ll be making many comparisons between them here. The closest fixed lens вЂcompactвЂ™ is FujifilmвЂ™s X100s which is noticeably smaller than the G1 X Mark II at 127x74x54mm and lighter as well at 445g including battery. To put this in perspective, the G1 X Mark II is similar in size to a Sony A6000 compact system camera, fitted with its 16-50mm kit zoom lens, and amazingly the Sony kit combo also weighs 100g less. This makes it roughly the same width and thickness as its predecessor, but a little shorter due partly to the removal of the optical viewfinder. They may share similar weights and dimensions, but are considerably larger than pretty much any other enthusiast-class fixed lens camera I can think of.ДЇor the record, the G1 X Mark II measures 116x74ењ†6.2mm and weighs 558g including battery. The PowerShot G1 X Mark II shares the same design philosophy as its predecessor, the original G1 X: both are substantial cameras, compact only by name.

CANON POWERSHOT G1 X MARK II VS SONY A6000 MANUAL

The lens barrel features two control dials, one smooth, one stepped, thereвЂ™s focus peaking to aid manual focusing, and thereвЂ™s built-in Wifi with NFC for wireless control and sharing.Д¬anon PowerShot G1 X II design and controls ThereвЂ™s a 3in screen which may no longer be side-hinged, but can still tilt vertically and twist round to face the subject, and now enjoys touch-sensitivity too. The hopeless optical rangefinder on the G1 X has been removed on the Mark II, allowing a smaller body, but viewfinder fans can mount an optional electronic viewfinder on the hotshoe if desired. Canon has also implemented a 9-blade aperture for circular out-of-focus rendering, and the closest focusing distance is also much improved, down from 20cm to 5cm. It may also have helped implement the longer zoom range up from 4x / 28-112mm to a much more useful 5x / 24-120mm, with a far brighter focal ratio too, f2-3.9 versus f2.8-5.8 on the older model. Interestingly the resolution has fallen slightly from 14.3 Megapixels in order to deliver the same field of view whether shooting in 3:2 or 4:3 note the resolution for each aspect ratio is 12.8 and 13.1 Megapixels respectively. Inside thereвЂ™s what appears to be the same 1.5in sensor, roughly the same size as a Micro Four Thirds sensor and comfortably larger than the 1in type found in SonyвЂ™s RX100 II. Announced in February 2014, the G1X Mark II is the successor to the original G1 X, launched two years earlier, but despite the Mark II name, itвЂ™s a considerably different camera I donвЂ™t think anyone would complain if it were called the G2 X instead.ДЇor the G1 X Mark II, Canon has sensibly kept what was good about the original camera вЂ“ the image quality вЂ“ and changed pretty much everything else, in theory addressing most of the complaints. The Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II is a high-end compact camera aimed at those who desire DSLR quality in a smaller, fixed lens body.

Canon powershot g1 x mark ii vs sony a6000